Re: [dspam-users] Please help!

[ wrapping long lines around 72 cars, except computer output, would be
 greatly appreciated; message reformatted. ]

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:41:01 -0500
"Andre Sourdiffe" <sourda@frlcpa.com> wrote:

> I am brand new to dspam, relatively new to Linux and postfix, but I'm
> learning. I really want to get dspam working with Postfix. Was using
> Amavisd and SpamAssassin.
>
> I set this up so that Postfix 2.2.3 sends to LMTP to Dspam 3.6 and
> Dspam sends back to SMTP on port 10026.
>
> I compiled Dspam using: ./configure --with-storage-driver=hash_drv
> --enable-clamav --enable-daemon --enable-debug.
>
> This is running on Redhat 9. I used the Postfix integration readme to
> set this up. I have checked and read and cannot figure out where I went
> wrong.
>
> I started dpsam this way:
>
> [root@Srv-filter root]# dspam --daemon --debug &
>
> And it responded with this:
>
> [2] 3935
> 3935: [11/09/2005 08:33:53] Daemon process starting
> 3935: [11/09/2005 08:33:53] spawning daemon listener
> 3935: [11/09/2005 08:33:53] Creating local domain socket /tmp/dspam.sock
> [root@Srv-filter root]# 3935: [11/09/2005 08:37:36] No QuarantineAgent option found. Using standard quarantine.
>
> When I tried to send mail through Postfix port 25 dpsam did this:
>
> [2]- Floating point exceptiondspam --daemon --debug
>
> And in the Postfix log I got this:
>
> postfix/lmtp[3940]: 3960766602: to=<sourda@frlcpa.com>, relay=/tmp/dspam.sock[/tmp/dspam.sock], delay=37, status=deferred (lost connection with /tmp/dspam.sock[/tmp/dspam.sock] while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once)
>
> And I discovered that dspam had bailed and was no longer running. I
> and not sure what other information may be needed to try to resolve
> this. Can someone direct me? Thanks.

You are using what dspam version ? See the last days list archives, it
seems there are some problems with hash_drv.

Compile with debugging symbols and submit a backtrace if dspam drops
core (which it seems to do judging the floating-point exception). Are
you on i386 or ?

-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
BOFH excuse #180:
ether leak