Re: [dspam-users] using DSPAM as a content filter (postfix.txt)

On Nov 20, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Andreas Neuhaus wrote:

>> OK, I'm convinced to try to upgrade my old 3.2.6 system using DSPAM
>> as an LDA to a content filter solution (both under Postfix).
>
> Since I was thinking about switching from a content filter to LDA
> on our
> server, I'd be interested in hearing your reasons for moving from
> LDA to
> content filter. What are the advantages of running it as a content-
> filter?

Well, in theory, this is the least invasive way to inject DSPAM into
my system setup (Mac OS X 10.4.3), but after hearing from a few folks
today, I changed my mind and am leaving it set up as an LDA for now.
(And have it working after the 3.6.1 upgrade, the way it always did.)

The main problem (according to them) is that DSPAM running in daemon
mode seems to go away every so often and thus require a restart. I
can't afford that kind of flakiness.

Are there folks using DSPAM in daemon mode under heavy load with
absolutely no problems?

Cheers!
--Chris Ryland / Em Software, Inc. / www.emsoftware.com
Received on Sun Nov 20 22:56:14 2005