--On Sunday, December 11, 2005 3:01 PM -0600 Mike Horwath <drechsau@Geeks.ORG> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:32:28PM -0800, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>
>> Replicated databases is the direction I was thinking of heading.
>> Wondering if anyone has a working config like this?
>
> Topposter,
Apologies - only in reply to a top post. If you were to look through my usenet postings you would see a long history of re-quoting and re-formatting to create (or re-create) proper in-context quoting. It gets tiring after a few duels with incurable top-posters ;>
> You will need full multi-master db replication to do this correctly.
>
> Oracle can do it.
Yup.
> MS-SQL can do it.
Arguably ;>
> MySQL has NDB clustering - which is kind of 'okay'.
Any other fos DBs that will?
What about some kind of central DB that is well behind the firewall (and handles the retraining), with replication out to the relays? Or can the relays cache/hash the info from a central DB so that they can retain autonomous operation (without new info of course) until the central DB comes back in service?
Received on Sun Dec 11 17:19:55 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 12 2005 - 00:00:01 EST