Re: [dspam-users] Problem with history (web interface)

From: Kyle Johnson <kjohnson@fixertec.net>
Date: Fri Jan 20 2006 - 14:41:01 EST

What changes does this make?

Kyle Johnson
Fixertec <http://www.fixertec.net/> - Dynamic Computer and Technology
Solutions
410-609-4191

Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> I have a fixed version of the cgi that I've given to a few people and
> sent to Jon... actually a few months ago. The problem is that the
> entire logic of the "paging" is broken, so its not just a patch but
> rather a replacement of the whole section of code. I'm not sure that
> my version is the best way to do things either, but it does take into
> account that fact that retrain events effecting a particular message
> are not neccesarily found nearby in the log.
> The fix is based on a 3.6 prerelease version, I'd be happy to
> integrate it into the current cgi if anyone is interested.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> On 1/20/06, *Kyle Johnson* <kjohnson@fixertec.net
> <mailto:kjohnson@fixertec.net>> wrote:
>
> We hear you :)
> This has been discussed a lot in #dspam, as well as a few times
> here on the mailing list.... The WebUI does need a rewrite,
> however Jon in a busy man, so it's going to fall into our hands to
> do this (most likely)
> Until then, it's best to keep up on the training, so you won't
> have to remember that much, and to open trained links in a new tab
> (ctrl+click) in firefox, as it saves a lot of time.
>
> Kyle Johnson
> Fixertec <http://www.fixertec.net/> - Dynamic Computer and
> Technology Solutions
> 410-609-4191
>
>
>
> Pierre Girard wrote:
>> Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Right now, the problem with the history of the WebUI is that
>>> when you click retrain on page > 2, you get sent back to page
>>> one. When you go back to page > 2, the message hasn't changed.
>>> This is only a visual bug, and the retraining should have still
>>> taken place..
>>
>> Yes that's the problem i have. I know it's some sort of visual
>> bug but given the amount of email and spam i receive everyday
>> it's still confusing not to be able to determine if i trained the
>> message or not since i have to rescan the whole thing everytime
>> and often have the same spam more than once. I often end up
>> retraining the same message multiple times.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Fri Jan 20 14:43:10 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 21 2006 - 00:00:01 EST