Re: [dspam-users] Problem with history (web interface)

This sounds good. How do we get a hold of it?

Kyle Johnson
Fixertec <http://www.fixertec.net/> - Dynamic Computer and Technology
Solutions
410-609-4191

Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> In a nutshell, rather than try to paginate by only viewing portions of
> the log (which is hopeless), it reads the entire log and creates a
> hash structure which identifies the correct current status of each and
> every message once the entire log has been processed. Then it
> displays only the correct portion of the hash according to the "page"
> you're on.
>
> The obvious drawback is that more memory and processing time is used,
> but I think it's going to have to be, since theoretically the more
> recent log entry could be a retrain of the oldest message.
>
> In practice, it add no observable load to my server with ~100 users,
> but the increase might become noticeable on a huge installation...
> dunno :)
>
> -Aaron
>
>
>
>
> On 1/20/06, *Kyle Johnson* <kjohnson@fixertec.net
> <mailto:kjohnson@fixertec.net>> wrote:
>
> What changes does this make?
>
> Kyle Johnson
> Fixertec <http://www.fixertec.net/> - Dynamic Computer and
> Technology Solutions
> 410-609-4191
>
>
>
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>> I have a fixed version of the cgi that I've given to a few people
>> and sent to Jon... actually a few months ago. The problem is
>> that the entire logic of the "paging" is broken, so its not just
>> a patch but rather a replacement of the whole section of code.
>> I'm not sure that my version is the best way to do things either,
>> but it does take into account that fact that retrain events
>> effecting a particular message are not neccesarily found nearby
>> in the log.
>> The fix is based on a 3.6 prerelease version, I'd be happy to
>> integrate it into the current cgi if anyone is interested.
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>>
>> On 1/20/06, *Kyle Johnson* <kjohnson@fixertec.net
>> <mailto:kjohnson@fixertec.net>> wrote:
>>
>> We hear you :)
>> This has been discussed a lot in #dspam, as well as a few
>> times here on the mailing list.... The WebUI does need a
>> rewrite, however Jon in a busy man, so it's going to fall
>> into our hands to do this (most likely)
>> Until then, it's best to keep up on the training, so you
>> won't have to remember that much, and to open trained links
>> in a new tab (ctrl+click) in firefox, as it saves a lot of time.
>>
>> Kyle Johnson
>> Fixertec <http://www.fixertec.net/> - Dynamic Computer and
>> Technology Solutions
>> 410-609-4191
>>
>>
>>
>> Pierre Girard wrote:
>>> Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right now, the problem with the history of the WebUI is
>>>> that when you click retrain on page > 2, you get sent back
>>>> to page one. When you go back to page > 2, the message
>>>> hasn't changed.
>>>> This is only a visual bug, and the retraining should have
>>>> still taken place...
>>>
>>> Yes that's the problem i have. I know it's some sort of
>>> visual bug but given the amount of email and spam i receive
>>> everyday it's still confusing not to be able to determine if
>>> i trained the message or not since i have to rescan the
>>> whole thing everytime and often have the same spam more than
>>> once. I often end up retraining the same message multiple
>>> times.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Fri Jan 20 15:12:16 2006