Re: [dspam-users] Problem with history (web interface)

From: LedHed <ledhed@ledhed.net>
Date: Mon Jan 23 2006 - 13:11:33 EST

Aaron Wolfe wrote:

> Ok, thanks for the clue. I am new to creating patches or working on
> someone else's code at all, really.
> Attached is a unified diff output.
>
> In the future, if I add a feature or fix a bug in the webui, what is
> the best/most appropriate way to share that with
> others? Or am I not supposed to do that at all?
> I plan to add some things that my users have been requesting
> (checkboxes on history screen for
> retraining multiple items, paging on the quarantine screen, etc).
> But I don't want to step on any toes or cause any
> problems by sharing those patches in the wrong way.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> On 1/22/06, *John Peacock* <jpeacock@rowman.com
> <mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com>> wrote:
>
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > Ok, below is the "patch" for dspam.cgi .. its more a rewrite of the
> > DisplayHistory sub.
> > It works for me, I hope it works for anyone else that is
> bothered by the
> > issues with the current webui history page.
> > If you find errors or know a better way to do this, please let
> me know.
> >
> > -Aaron
>
> Two things:
>
> 1) Please use 'diff -u' or 'diff -c' when submitting diffs
> (unified or context
> diffs, respectively, are much easier for humans to review).
>
> 2) It would be better to send the diff as an attachment (to
> prevent your mail
> client from munging long lines), but if you are going to include
> it in the body
> of a message, please do not also include remnants of the message
> thread (since
> the same line marker is used for "newfile" as for "previous
> message").
>
> John
>
> --
> John Peacock
> Director of Information Research and Technology
> Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
> 4720 Boston Way
> Lanham, MD 20706
> 301-459-3366 x.5010
> fax 301-429-5747
>
>
I and many others would love to see your improvements make their way
into the dspam.cgi. As was said earlier, Jon is a busy man, so if you
can make this happen I'm sure many people would appreciate it.

Another feature I've been asking for in the WebUI is an "UnTrain"
feature, if someone mistakenly trains Ham as Spam (or vice versa) they
can reverse their training.

Good luck,

-Jeff Harris
Received on Mon Jan 23 13:13:44 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 24 2006 - 00:00:01 EST