mouss wrote:
>you mean "stored procedure"s ("transactions" were already supported in
>4.x). Stored procedures are in 5.x.
>
>
Yes, that's what I'm thinking of. Mind you, transactional performance
wasn't exactly *great* in MySQL 4 from what I understand, so you could
still think of that as an advantage.
>so I guess there is no real benefit of ms-sql over pgsql.
>
>
I haven't seen one, no. Especially PG8, which has lots of really
interesting features that MS-SQL lacks, AFAIK. Of course, I spend more
time using Postgres than SQL Server, so I could be wrong about that...
Received on Tue Jan 24 18:11:12 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 26 2006 - 00:00:01 EST