>From owner-dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Oct 23 00:42:37
Received: from topsy.nuclearelephant.com (HELO topsy.nuclearelephant.com) (209.51.159.242)
by mail.domesticsecurity.com.au (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:42:37 +1000
Received: by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix)
id C506633B4; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: dspam-users-groupies@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C21944541
for <dspam-users-groupies@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from topsy.nuclearelephant.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0A933B4
for <dspam-users-groupies@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix, from userid 86)
id BB0C947A8; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Delivered-To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9386C33B4
for <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from topsy.nuclearelephant.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9059C4541
for <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from alfa.jamaro.com.pl (alfa.jamaro.com.pl [212.244.32.2])
by topsy.nuclearelephant.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA9333B4
for <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from SeniorePC (ebu89.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.22.210.89])
by alfa.jamaro.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921F5AFB58
for <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:42:12 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <0AE0BAE6654F4CDEA4024318D58FD54E@SeniorePC>
From: "Marcin Raubal" <marcin@jamaro.pl>
To: "DSPAM List" <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>
Subject: [dspam-users] Released tagged mail goes always to single dspam user.
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:42:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.5600.16384
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.5600.16384
Sender: owner-dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
List-Id: dspam-users
X-DSPAM-Connection: 209.51.159.242:50823 --> 60.240.23.57:25
X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Oct 23 00:42:37 2006
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5705
X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 453b835d280759504617225
X-DSPAM-Factors: 15,
from, 0.99000,
Received*ESMTP, 0.99000,
Hello, 0.01000,
Received*Sun+22, 0.99000,
all, 0.99000,
to+the, 0.99000,
when, 0.99000,
one, 0.99000,
6, 0.99000,
Received*localhost+(localhost, 0.01000,
I, 0.99000,
after, 0.99000,
Received*(Postfix)+with, 0.01000,
Received*with+ESMTP, 0.99000,
Received*Sun, 0.99000
X-CLAMAV-Results: Unscanned - not multipart
Hello,
when I set the Preference "spamAction=tag"
all spam goes to one account - DSPAM.
When the Preference "spamAction" is set to "quarantine"
everything works perfectly, after releasing a FalsePositive
from the quarantine the message goes to the designated user mailbox.
Does anybody know what`s wrong ?
DSPAM v.3.6.8-STABLE, running on Debian Sarge 3.1 with Postfix without MySQL
Greets,
Marcin
Received on Sun Oct 22 18:47:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 25 2006 - 03:01:50 CEST