John Peacock wrote:
> Patrick T. Tsang wrote:
>> Hello Sergey,
>>> Every incoming message is splitted by DSPAM to several ones according to
>>> destinations and then every address processed by DSPAM itself and two
>>> additional antiviruses with help of AMAVISD.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand.
>> Why the incoming message is "splitted"? and how it can be "splitted"
>> by dspam?
>
> Actually, I think it is Postfix that is serializing the e-mails (i.e.
> sending a message to dspam once for each local recipient). But the
> practical effect is as he describes.
>
> The basic design of SMTP is that you may have multiple recipients (the
> MTA knows which ones are local and will list those in the envelope) for
> any given e-mail, but dspam is normally configured to process mail
> independently for each local address. Apart from configuring dspam to
> use a single global address, there is no way to prevent that "splitting"
> from happening (indeed it is required).
>
By me, it seems to be very close to true!
By the way, i've tried to "throw out" dspam from my configuration
leaving only amavisd working, after that any e-mail message (including
with multiple addresses) has been processed only once (except from the
local delivery).
Can you please give my any advice how to implement dspam with a
"single global address" ?
Thanks in advance
> HTH
>
> John
Sergey Ivakin
Received on Tue Nov 7 15:56:22 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 08 2006 - 00:00:07 CET