Re: [dspam-users] Re:

Tony Earnshaw schrieb:
> Norman wrote, on 16. mar 2007 07:44:
>
> [...]
>
>> Sure... its not the right place
>
> Not the right place? NOT THE RIGHT PLACE? It can never work, bugger
> "not the right place".
>
>> but please not be such personal. That will help noone.
>
> Crap. People without knowledge of the basic OS on which they're
> working shouldn't be allowed near a computer - witness the thousands
> of messages our main site is turning away from cracked bot machines
> per week. There are licenses for competence in all sorts of things
> that can harm other people, why not one for computers?
>
> OP's machine came with comprehensive documentation and he can not be
> bothered to read *any* of it. Well, he better had.

True, reading documentation should be the first step before do anything
else. But acting such "aggressiv" is totally unneccessary.

>
>> BTW, maybe this is helpful:
>> http://burks.brighton.ac.uk/burks/linux/rute/node17.htm
>
> Who's said that OP is using Linux? If he is, then a link to FHS might
> be better:
>
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html

Look at the second post i made.. I allready noticed ;-)

>
> But if he's using BSD or any other Unix variant, then both of the
> above links will be useless.

True..
>
> The trouble is, that people with Windows mentalities are taking to
> other systems without the motivation either to find out about them or
> even consult wikis (the simplest form of acquisition of any knowledge)
> or use search engines. They should be required to take a test before
> being let loose on the Internet.
>
> Everybody who's given OP useless advice up to now should be required
> to take that test.
>
> --Tonni

bye
Norman
Received on Fri Mar 16 09:24:11 2007