Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM on FreeBSD 7-STABLE freezes after 1-2 days

From: 2beone <2beone@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 19:38:54 UTC

hi

is there one place where all the known and maybe unknow ;) dspam
patches are being collected?

2008/7/9 Steve <steeeeeveee@gmx.net>:
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:50:01 -0500
>> Von: Troy Ayers <dspam1234@wcta.net>
>> An: dspam-users <dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com>
>> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM on FreeBSD 7-STABLE freezes after 1-2 days
>
>> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:03:47 -0500
>> > Troy Ayers <dspam1234@wcta.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Noor Dawod wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello folks,
>> >>>
>> >>> I have DSPAM run on FreeBSD 7-STABLE with latest Postfix, Postgrey,
>> >>> Dovecot and Amavisd. The DSPAM is running as a content filter
>> >>> defined in master.cf (--daemon option).
>> >>> Every one or two days, the DSPAM daemon stops listening to incoming
>> >>> connections and Postfix defers all deliverable messages because
>> >>> DSPAM doesn't accept connections.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone has an idea what to do in order to debug this problem?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>
>> >>> /Comrax
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> I don't have any ideas on debugging the problem. IIRC, some previous
>> >> version of dspam would freeze unless logging was disabled. Try
>> >> disable logging? (I can't find any archived messages to backup my
>> >> assertion though)
>> >>
>> >> I'm curious. You running 64bit version of Freebsd?
>> >>
>> >> What version of DSPAM?
>> >>
>> >> At any rate I use dspam but not deamonized, because of stability
>> >> problems such as what you describe.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Can you elaborate? I'm not sure, but I don't remember a bug report
>> > about this. Did I miss you email or forgot about it?
>> >
>> >
>> There not much to tell really. In my case I was running dspam 3.6.4
>> (later I tried 3.6.6 then 3.6.8), on RHEL4 on X86_64.
>>
>> http://mailing-list.nuclearelephant.com/2883.html
>>
>> At the time, I believe there was no facility to file a bug report.
>>
> I think this was due the bug in bnr debugging and was/is fixed with this patch:
> --- src/libdspam.c 2006-07-17 02:14:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ src/libdspam.fix_bnr_debug.c 2007-12-10 20:33:53.905085288 +0100
> @@ -986,8 +986,10 @@
> if (CTX->flags & DSF_NOISE) {
> nobnr_result = _ds_calc_result(CTX, heap_nobnr, diction);
>
> - if (CTX->factors)
> + if (CTX->factors) {
> _ds_factor_destroy(CTX->factors);
> + CTX->factors = NULL;
> + }
> CTX->result = x;
> CTX->probability = DSP_UNCALCULATED;
> }
>
>
>>
>> -Troy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
> Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
>
>
>
>
>

!DSPAM:1011,487513d3150921574319036!
Received on Wed Jul 9 19:39:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 11 2008 - 00:00:16 UTC